From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Apr 18 04:36:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA00612
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 04:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA00607
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 04:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA11856; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 04:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Jay L. West" <jlwest@tseinc.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: new kernel make from 2.1R to 2.1-stable 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Apr 1996 06:23:51 CDT."
             <199604181123.GAA04052@bsd.tseinc.com> 
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 04:36:22 -0700
Message-ID: <11854.829827382@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> We upgraded 2.1R to stable, did a make world, and then remade the kernel.
> All seems to be well, but I vaguely recall someone here saying that there
> was a special step in making the new kernel when going 2.1R to stable. It

Nope, none that I know of!

> The message said this was essential. All we did was a standard kernel remake
> (config, make, make install). Are we ok or do we need the special steps
> previously mentioned and if so what are they?

You're fine.

					Jordan