Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:42:48 -0700 From: Walt Pawley <walt@wump.org> To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>, "Born, Clinton" <Clinton.Born@dig.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? Message-ID: <a05210230c0f009f7cfda@[10.0.0.10]> In-Reply-To: <54BDA592-E798-4A1C-A53E-72C8707B3630@shire.net> References: <88D3FDF2A772ED44BCF8C91626ECD06905FD0A75@sm-cala-xm20.swna.wd pr.disney.com> <54BDA592-E798-4A1C-A53E-72C8707B3630@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 6:30 PM -0600 7/27/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> Really? I wouldn't want such a myopic view when choosing to
>> allocate our
>> shareholders dollars. Best tool for the job. Period!
>
>That is not as easy as you make it out to be. WHat one might in the
>short term see as the best tool may not be such in 2 years ...
Good luck on figuring out what's "best", anyway. IMHO, things
are seldom so simple whether time passage is considered or not.
--
Walter M. Pawley <walt@wump.org>
Wump Research & Company
676 River Bend Road, Roseburg, OR 97470
541-672-8975
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a05210230c0f009f7cfda>