Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:49:47 +0200
From:      Adam PAPAI <wooh@wooh.hu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sysbench / fileio - Linux vs. FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <4C0B7D4B.4080402@wooh.hu>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimtEjQp32LOO-YDW1eBACJMJWGxT4YnrnV39fkp@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu> <AANLkTimtEjQp32LOO-YDW1eBACJMJWGxT4YnrnV39fkp@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 6/5/10 2:43 AM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 5 June 2010 00:58, Adam PAPAI <wooh@wooh.hu> wrote:
> 
>> How can I tune my disk to make it faster? Is it possible? What is the
>> reason of the really slow I/O with more than 4 threads? What do you
>> recommend me to do? Why is it damn slow with 8K blocksize?
> 
> Does linux still have async disk writes by default?

Anyway, I looked after the default ext3 values:

Debian mounts the ext3 with "defaults" option.

This means: rw, suid, dev, exec, auto, nouser, and async.

Well it means I have to test it with UFS (async) and Debian (sync).

These test will take some time but I hope it worth the effort.

Hm...


- -- 
Adam PAPAI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMC31LAAoJEGq0EWvh5uiIu3MH/i7KWfcYj2zXSsqbUK2W4dKi
B0+pD861FBtxmS+O4c4jzR5vJYeVVyVfZ4DLpHs0tqr6u2QZWgTD5c9GXxRNn9Hg
pVIL8/iL9BGtjNZdbjKU2RlE+QOb4LUuxqTWtz3poH4e6CQlAMOzvBcmbK41eWVn
nr2/jlS8n7TFk74ewAH9NXABrhIaOtCjBf5YWWA9AnKhqjdlAM7gxC6QcbsGTLlR
5zvq6UfGuAMECOV98FDlm3k20LydLT0/Mdw9jth9+50v1NMnAddYjfZ/7Ci2KzZo
uUN1VRcOhxmw6oliMPu/+Z324d6Xrp1vXpDQN8tSzME1d3O3CswPDfs3ocpjmkU=
=VEsH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0B7D4B.4080402>