From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:26:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5293C16A4BF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F8443FDF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:26:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from 12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com ([12.234.22.23]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <200309052326060130036ve6e>; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 23:26:06 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:26:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <20030905212233.GB590@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Message-ID: <20030905162408.C90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> References: <42548.1062488547@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030902004917.S6074@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <3F58B8B7.30107@tcoip.com.br> <20030905110128.Y8003@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030905135542.M90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> <20030905212233.GB590@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Alexey Dokuchaev cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:26:11 -0000 On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Yes, you can. The agreement is reached when everybody accepts the > outcome. This is unrelated to whether everybody likes the outcome. I would argue that we're now discussing two different things.... consensus on the result, versus consensus on what the desired result is, and the method(s) of achieving it. However, I won't quibble further. > > Don't take this the wrong way, but with an attitude like that, how do > > you get out of bed in the morning? > > Willpower, eased by the habit of getting out of bed in the afternoon. LOL... touche. > > The consensus was that we'd use > > seperators for all NEW knobs, and go back and deal with the rest if time > > allows. > > Yes, the first part of the sentence I remember. I can't recall the > second part. If my memory is failing on me and we did in fact reach > that consensus, then there's nothing to argue about. Otherwise we > still need to get clear ruling on that last part. As promised, I posted my bikeshed blueprints for this on -arch. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection