Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 00:27:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245365] www/py-django-jsonfield : Update to 3.1.0 Message-ID: <bug-245365-21822-fJOiMvNDdR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245365-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245365-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245365 Richard Gallamore <ultima@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(ultima |maintainer-feedback+ |@freebsd.org) | --- Comment #3 from Richard Gallamore <ultima@freebsd.org> --- I'm waiting for Seafile to officially release there next minor release vers= ion. It is currently only officially in beta, but it should be officially releas= ed any day now. I have patches ready for those ports (Seafile bundle) but will need some time to test them to make sure I didn't miss anything. Once that is completed I was planning on upgrading the dependencies but I haven't touched them at the moment because every changelog I have looked at= has officially removed python27 support and I don't want to risk breaking any deployments. I'm not so sure about the Django upgrade, this probably won't be compatible= and would definitely need testing. Unfortunately, Seafile has a record for stay= ing on the oldest LTS channel supported. D12592 was going to solve the static Django dependency problem in ports but= it looks like it was rejected by port mgmt. I'm not sure if there is another solution in the works at the moment or if one already exists but it does se= em like a problem that needs to be solved. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245365-21822-fJOiMvNDdR>