From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 23:29:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8787B10656A5 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530128FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.221.2] (remotevpn [192.168.221.2]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7QN0ftg058695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:00:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <4C76F210.5020207@feral.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:00:32 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <4C76D981.7080602@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C76D981.7080602@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ns1.feral.com [192.168.221.1]); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Questions about FreeBSD and Linux on the same disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:29:58 -0000 On 8/26/2010 2:15 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Howdy, > > I'm looking to expand my horizons so I'm experimenting with Ubuntu. I > was given the advice to use ext2 file systems so that I could mount > the Linux disks from FreeBSD but it seems that we have support up > through ext4? Or perhaps the port of efs2progs is necessary for that? > I don't mind using ext2 if that's the best choice, but if I can use > the newer (better?) option that's fine too. What I am looking for is > the "safe" choice, a way to mount the partitions that a) won't crash > FreeBSD, and b) won't cause data loss. This would be for both FreeBSD > 7-stable and 9-current. I share systems on disks quite a lot. But my typical usage is have Linux be the primary system and use grub to chainboot the FreeBSD partitions. If I absolutely must have a shared filesystem between the two, MS-DOS is the safest choice.