Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 03:41:25 +0900 From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Using DEPORIGIN in portupgrade Message-ID: <86k7jycuy2.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: <86n0pczq6u.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> References: <3DAD5BCA.8D2B10F@FreeBSD.org> <3DAEAA2A.8502F644@FreeBSD.org> <86n0pczq6u.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Fri, 18 Oct 2002 06:54:49 +0900,
I wrote:
> > > Do you have any plans to make use of a freshly added recording of
> > > DEPORIGIN information in +CONTENTS for resolving dependencies? This
> > > should allow to avoid all those "stale dependency" messages once for
> > > all, thus bringing packages updating mechanism one step closer to
> > > ideal.
I've just finished implementing the DEPORIGIN support in the
portupgrade suite, but ports (bsd.port.mk) doesn't seem to have the
ability to record DEPORIGIN yet. Do you have a patch to add that?
--
/
/__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
/ ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp
"When I leave I don't know what I'm hoping to find
When I leave I don't know what I'm leaving behind.."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k7jycuy2.wl>