Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:50:03 GMT From: Joseph Lenox <lenox.joseph@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/137617: security/libgcrypt: error: shared library "gpg-error.0" does not exist Message-ID: <200908140350.n7E3o3qj059733@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/137617; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Joseph Lenox <lenox.joseph@gmail.com> To: stan@dosonresorthotel.net, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137617: security/libgcrypt: error: shared library "gpg-error.0" does not exist Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:46:28 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000409010900020409070005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Stan, I'm pretty sure the issue is either with libgpg-error or libgcrypt, not ImageMagick. --Joseph Lenox stan@dosonresorthotel.net wrote: > Dear FreeBSD, > > Thanks for your prompt repl and sincere assistance. > > I think the bugs come from the port of ImageMagick. When I installed the > FreeBSD 7.2 without updating te ports, no errors occur, but after updating > the ports, the error code 1 happens. > > Thanks and regards > > Stanley >>> could not reproduce your problem. >>> It looks something might have gone wrong while building >>> security/libgpg-error. >>> Could you please delete libgpg-error-1.7 and start over again? >> I've attempted the same build with the same issue. According to >> libgpg-error, everything compiles and installs fine. However, >> libgpg-error's >> package does complain that libgpg-error.so.0 doesn't exist in >> /usr/local/lib >> on a deinstall attempt. libgpg-error's install script does not attempt to >> make libgpg-error.so.0. >> >> I've done a full delete (clean, distclean, make) for libgpg-error. >> >> Looking at an older version of the ports tree (libgpg-error-1.6), I see >> that >> libgpg-error.so.0 is being built, but libgpg-error.so.5 is not. I >> symlinked >> libgpg-error.so.5 -> libgpg-error.so.0 and libgcrypt compiled. I then ran >> a >> check over it and all of the tests passed. >> >> I'm going to call that a workaround. I'm not sure where the fix should be >> applied -- should libgpg-error create the check for the difference in >> filename and symlink a .so.0, or should libgcrypt accept either file? >> >> -- Joseph Lenox >> >> -- >> "Nothing unreal exists." - Kiri-kin-tha's First Law of Metaphysics. >> > > > --------------000409010900020409070005 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="lenox_joseph.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="lenox_joseph.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQNCmZuOkpvc2VwaCBMZW5veA0KbjpMZW5veDtKb3NlcGgNCmFkcjpBcHQu IDQxQjs7ODAwIEUuIEdyYW5kIEF2ZTtDYXJib25kYWxlO0lMOzYyOTAxO1VTQQ0KZW1haWw7 aW50ZXJuZXQ6bGVub3guam9zZXBoQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ0KdGVsO2NlbGw6ODE1LTU2Ni05MDg2 DQp4LW1vemlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQ0KdmVyc2lvbjoyLjENCmVuZDp2Y2FyZA0KDQo= --------------000409010900020409070005--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200908140350.n7E3o3qj059733>