From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 17 9:32:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from 1Cust252.tnt3.washington.dc.da.uu.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F03B14CF1; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:32:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:32:09 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Jun Kuriyama Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 0xdeadc0de ??? In-Reply-To: <14467.14628.579240.98517T@localhost.sky.rim.or.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > I found message below at inserting aue0 (after pccard ed0 > insert/remove). > > ----- > aue0: LUA-TX MELCO LUA-TX, rev 1.10/1.01, addr 2 > aue0: Ethernet address: 00:40:26:61:10:c7 > miibus0: on aue0 > ukphy0: on miibus0 > ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > Data modified on freelist: word 7 of object 0xc0828400 size 364 previous type USBdev (0x0 != 0xdeadc0de) > aue0: starting DAD for fe80:0003::0240:26ff:fe61:10c7 > aue0: DAD complete for fe80:0003::0240:26ff:fe61:10c7 - no duplicates found > ----- > > Should I track this behaviour (if I can revisit this message), or I > can simply ignore this message? > Basically, this means that you correctly enabled INVARIANT* to catch bugs, and you found one. Here, it seems that a USBdev is being used after being free()d. I'd suggest reporting it directly to Bill Paul and Nick Hibma, since they'll be familiar with their code :) > > Jun Kuriyama // kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp > // kuriyama@FreeBSD.org > -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message