From owner-freebsd-fs Mon Mar 17 12:33: 1 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C10737B401; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:33:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABD043F85; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:33:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 223DA2ED412; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:33:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:33:00 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Julian Elischer Cc: FreeBSD current users , fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone working on fsck? Message-ID: <20030317203300.GQ4145@elvis.mu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Julian Elischer [030317 12:22] wrote: > > Is there anyone working on fsck? > Recent timings with a fast machine with 1TB filesystems > show that it takes abuot 6 hours to fsck such a filesystem > (on a fast array with a lot of RAM) > > This is with a version of fsck that already has some locally developed > speedups and changes. I have not dared time the standard one yet. Is this with or without the intentional delay introduced in order to avoid monopolizing the disk in background mode? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message