From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 5 8:32:59 2001 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 08:32:57 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B8D37B400 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:32:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f05GWmL03383; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:32:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:32:48 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Fernan Aguero Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: large files? Message-ID: <20010105103247.C5994@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20010105131204.Q890@iib005.iib.unsam.edu.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13i In-Reply-To: <20010105131204.Q890@iib005.iib.unsam.edu.ar>; from "Fernan Aguero" on Fri Jan 5 13:12:04 GMT 2001 X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Sender: dan@dan.emsphone.com Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Jan 05), Fernan Aguero said: > I'm currently having problems with my linux boxes since I cannot deal > with large (> 2Gb) files. I am evaluating other OSes to replace Linux > mainly because I heard that *BSD does not have this limitation on > file size. > > The situation in Linux looks complicated to me (a biologist that > turned to bioinformatics) because the issue appears to involve both > the kernel and the kind of filesystem used. Also, you still have to > recompile your apps to enable the support for large files. > > How is this managed in *BSD? FreeBSD did it right from the start, by making all syscalls use 64-bit values for file sizes. The FFS filesystem also supports large files. There is no such thing as a "2gb limit" on FreeBSD. > My main needs are being able to: > cp, mv, compress/uncompress, cat, grep large files (I may be missing > something here, but you get the idea) Tail has problems on large files, but only because it tries to mmap the entire file at once. That's the only program I can remember having problems with. I can personally vouch for cp, mv, gzip, cat, and grep :) > BTW how is the performance of linux binaries running on *BSD in > emulation mode? Are there any benchmark results or similar tests > online? Do 100% of linux binaries run emulated or is the percentage > lower? You don't take any performance hit by running Linux binaries, and 99.9% of Linux binaries work under the Linuxulator, including Netscape, Oracle8, and Microfocus Cobol. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message