Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 01:22:35 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hugelatex / teTeX / conflicts between different ports (generic) Message-ID: <20020329012235.A295@phoenix.dmnshq.net> In-Reply-To: <20020328185405.B42896@databits.net>; from petef@databits.net on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:54:05PM -0500 References: <20020329004501.A36555@phoenix.dmnshq.net> <20020328185405.B42896@databits.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:54:05PM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote: > ++ 29/03/02 00:45 +0100 - Eivind Eklund: > | filechecker is a small script I wrote; available from > | http://people.freebsd.org/~eivind/filechecker > | > | It does some consistency checks on /var/db/pkg/, and I'm intending to also > | make to do consistency checks against the actual file system, but presently it > | only does duplicate file registration checks. > > Cool! Have you considered committing this to ports/Tools/scripts? :) I was planning to add it as an a non-distfile port (like cdiff, my diff viewer, and safesh, my ssh authentication manager - the latter is highly recommended for anybody using ssh keys towards different servers, BTW) as soon as I've finished it - ie, added support for verifying e.g. /usr/local against the package database, and written a manpage. This would probably be later tonight or tomorrow. I'd think the verification of what is actually installed (including finding files that are not registered in /var/db/pkg) would make it generally useful so it should be a port - do you agree? Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020329012235.A295>