From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 20 19:02:42 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E05675C9;
 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:02:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F9DBCB;
 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:02:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124])
 by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 083A6B93A;
 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:02:41 -0500 (EST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:44:06 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; )
References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home>
 <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home>
 <CAJ-VmomspE98+45nF8x6UYEhPPUOj-N2N+4xwJahrc7AG1spgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomspE98+45nF8x6UYEhPPUOj-N2N+4xwJahrc7AG1spgQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201501201044.07013.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:02:41 -0500 (EST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:02:43 -0000

On Sunday, January 18, 2015 11:20:21 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hm, someone just needs to do the MFC. I don't have stable/10 on any
> laptop, so I'd be doing it blind.

I think most of these types of MFCs are blind as most of the folks testing it 
in HEAD are running HEAD.

> Would someone with stable/10 please MFC 270516 from HEAD? Pretty please?

Eh, you can always use a VM to test the 10 build if you wish, but since you 
committed this head, you should just MFC it to 10.  You've already gotten one 
confirmation by a user reporting that it works fine when merged, so I think 
that is ample.

-- 
John Baldwin