From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Aug 18 12:17:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998AA14D25; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA51103; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:07:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:07:21 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: Kris Kennaway Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ only for FreeBSD 2.x? Message-ID: <19990818200721.A49279@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Kris Kennaway on Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 11:55:10AM -0700 Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 11:55:10AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > The title of the FAQ at http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ.html is "Frequently > Asked Questions for FreeBSD 2.X". Shouldn't this be "3.x", or better yet, > specify no version number (so it's not forgotten again when 4.x becomes > -stable?) I agree. What we also need is someone to go through it and identify which answers in the FAQ were 2.x specific, or no longer apply because the problem's been fixed. Any volunteers? N -- [intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed, non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs the links. -- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message