From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Jul 24 22:50:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863B437B9C1 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:50:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07736; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:49:31 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:49:30 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: Bernie Doehner Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux Staroffice 5.2 under 4.0-RELEASE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, there! On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Bernie Doehner wrote: > Dear Emulation Group: > > I am trying to create a Staroffice 5.2 ports entry, and I ran into minor > problem. As part of the installation, libraries are extracted out of the > self extracting executable, and then a setup.bin (linux executable) is run > from that same directory. > > This doesn't work so well, because Linux ld doesn't check the current > directory for new libraries (only /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.cache is used). > Is this by design or is there be a way to have the Linux ld also look > at the current directory for new libraries? export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message