From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 12:35:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E3716A4B3; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2E643FEC; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:35:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h94JZNB6030504; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:35:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h94JZNUj030503; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:35:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h94JUCYJ065458; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:30:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200310041930.h94JUCYJ065458@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 04 Oct 2003 22:03:37 +0300." <20031004190337.GB94900@sunbay.com> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 20:30:12 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/50349: make release fails with NO_OPENSSH and ! NOKERBEROS X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:35:25 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov writes: > It can be done, by teaching release/Makefile to build world with NOCRYPT > and a lot of other hacking that will obfuscate it, but I just don't see > much point doing this -- it seems much easier to me to remove the crypto > distribution from the release media. Yeah. This is about right. There have been may years' worth of crypto-insanity in FreeBSD, and we are trying to remove it, not entrench it. The crypto stuff in nicely separated out, and I wouldn't mind seeing further separation (dev tools, LPR, sendmail, etc) done as separately installable components, similar to the crypto install. release/* is already a horrendous hack, and to make it take into account build options would make it _horrible_. > Mark, what do you think? I think we need to aim for further simplification :-) If you don't like crypto, 'rm -rf' is your friend. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH