Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 23:50:40 -0500 From: Frank Pawlak <fpawlak@execpc.com> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD, .Net comments - any reponse to this reasoning? Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010630234846.00a765c8@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <20010630235936.A90173@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010630171811.02696a70@127.0.0.1> <20010630174743.A85268@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20010630171811.02696a70@127.0.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's what some of us are here for. dejanews are its' most recent incarnation is a good place to start your search. BTW: John is a former member of the FreeBSD core team. Good luck Frank At 11:59 PM 6/30/2001 +0100, j mckitrick wrote: >On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:24:44PM -0500, Frank Pawlak wrote: >| The GPL vs BSD license issue has been debated almost to death on the >| various comp.unix *. lists and other places. For the interested do a >| search on John Dyson and you will find all sorts of material. John has >| engaged in many an argument on the license issue. > >Ah, great. Just what i was looking for. Really. > >I'm sure the heavies on this list have tired of my naivete'. ;-) > >jcm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20010630234846.00a765c8>