From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 3 20:00:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA151065674 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@acm.org) Received: from fallbackmx07.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx07.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEFC8FC08 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.195]) by fallbackmx07.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q33K0fan002721 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:00:41 +1000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-116-103.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.116.103]) by mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q33K0UlH023169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:00:31 +1000 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q33K0T4G024087; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:00:29 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q33K0SDR024086; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:00:28 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:00:27 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Beeblebrox Message-ID: <20120403200027.GC25776@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20120329072054.GA45082@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120403074954.GA19241@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lagg problems on diskless client X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:00:49 -0000 --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-03 14:51:57 +0300, Beeblebrox wrote: >Slightly different point of view: Under this scenario of dikless clients >having dual NICs would CRAP be a choice to consider? From what I have read >it can offer loadbalancing but as I understand it's not really applicable >to diskless node situations? (Two amusing typos in one sentence). Based on what you've said so far, no. carp provides load-balancing or failover between two (or more) hosts. lagg provides load-balancing or failover between two (or more) NICs on one host. --=20 Peter Jeremy --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk97VtsACgkQ/opHv/APuIfcNgCfQJN4tK6O0u9V7nfm8/TpcwXJ BVcAn3bQggX1LdplbQ8Jze73nFdl1Hw0 =Kn2r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--