Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:00:27 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lagg problems on diskless client Message-ID: <20120403200027.GC25776@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <CAPSTskvbj%2BV6Q2XvPHS%2BogjSWEzk5CM5TRHgW94Kt-u6o8vt9w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPSTskviJ26uuoAhRVN7tLBj7AhAPVuQz5GSBCd%2BszGPF2VOfw@mail.gmail.com> <20120329072054.GA45082@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <CAPSTsktpDXHXDR1-MgWBZRTwXvHGrdZ=g5wH-=Lkd-JwMmJ95A@mail.gmail.com> <20120403074954.GA19241@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <CAPSTskueYtD%2B=zdwLFJkTvxHPXnpDvb4SQGHsb=RA8vq6iiewQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPSTskvbj%2BV6Q2XvPHS%2BogjSWEzk5CM5TRHgW94Kt-u6o8vt9w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-03 14:51:57 +0300, Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> wrote: >Slightly different point of view: Under this scenario of dikless clients >having dual NICs would CRAP be a choice to consider? From what I have read >it can offer loadbalancing but as I understand it's not really applicable >to diskless node situations? (Two amusing typos in one sentence). Based on what you've said so far, no. carp provides load-balancing or failover between two (or more) hosts. lagg provides load-balancing or failover between two (or more) NICs on one host. --=20 Peter Jeremy --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk97VtsACgkQ/opHv/APuIfcNgCfQJN4tK6O0u9V7nfm8/TpcwXJ BVcAn3bQggX1LdplbQ8Jze73nFdl1Hw0 =Kn2r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120403200027.GC25776>