From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Apr 16 02:05:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA06345 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 02:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolfenet.com (news1.wolfe.net [204.157.98.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA06334 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 02:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from red2 (sea-ts7-p34.wolfenet.com [204.157.101.160]) by wolfenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA16012; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 02:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <335495AD.1C01F62A@wolfenet.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 02:02:37 -0700 From: Aron Roberts X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b3 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" CC: Thomas Arnold , Doug Russell , Chuck Robey , Stephen Roome , Dave Alderman , hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <199704160747.AAA04872@MindBender.serv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk If I find the time I'll be benching an AMD K6/200 vs. an Intel P5/200-MMX.. I'd like to also throw in a PPRO but I want to do nothing other than swap the chips... More than likely I'll bench under NetBSD 1.2.1 but if I find the time I might do FreeBSD 2.2.1 as well. Let me know what benchmarks you want to see.. I'll probably get around to it sometime next week. preliminary reports from popping the K6 into my NT box is that it is "da sh*t". I'll grab an OpenGL board and pound on it with softimage in the mean time. aron Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > > >On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Doug Russell wrote: > >> Oh... By the way. Has anyone done any benchmarks on the K6 chips under > >> FreeBSD yet? If not, let me know what tests you all want done on one, > [...] > > >Gee. Ask and ye shall receive! > [K6-166 only stats deleted] > > That's nice, but can you post a competative comparison against > something else? The stats do nothing for me all by themselves. > Thanks. > >