From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 14 11:22:36 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F7C37B401 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3.ruraltel.net (mail3.ruraltel.net [24.225.0.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE37243FAF for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:22:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 13175 invoked by uid 204); 14 Mar 2003 19:22:32 -0000 Received: from darryl@osborne-ind.com by mail3.ruraltel.net by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.14 (F-PROT: 3.12spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:SA:0(-0.8/5.0):. Processed in 0.572135 secs); 14 Mar 2003 19:22:31 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: darryl@osborne-ind.com via mail3.ruraltel.net X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.14 (Clear:SA:0(-0.8/5.0):. Processed in 0.572135 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO darryl) (24.225.31.189) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 19:22:31 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Darryl Hoar" To: "'Stephen Hilton'" Cc: Subject: RE: Arplookup - what gives ? Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:23:46 -0600 Message-ID: <002501c2ea5f$3c38bfe0$0701a8c0@darryl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20030314122009.16725e05.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03, USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK version=2.43 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG traceroute just gives 1. * * * * 2. * * * * etc till you kill it. But ping works. >-----Original Message----- >From: Stephen Hilton [mailto:nospam@hiltonbsd.com] >Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:20 PM >To: darryl@osborne-ind.com >Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG >Subject: Re: Arplookup - what gives ? > > >On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:43:11 -0600 >Stephen Hilton wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:33:08 -0600 >> "Darryl Hoar" wrote: >> >> > Greetings, >> > I have posted several questions regarding an arplookup failure >> > message I have been receiving. I have google'd until my >> > eyes are falling out, and have found nothing that explains >> > how to FIX the problem. >> > >> > I am running 4.7-stable on a box. It is my firewall, nat box. >> > ep0 is connected to my ISP's dsl. ep1 is connected to >> > my internal private LAN. My internal lan uses the private >> > ip addresses 192.168.1.x. I have two machines on my >> > internal lan, not including the firewall box. >> > >> > I am getting >> > /kernel arplookup failure: 10.1.1.1 not on local network. >> > >> > my ISP assigns a real IP to my ep0 interface usings dhcp. >> > >> > what is causing this and how do I stop it ? I have added a >> > rule to block 10.x.x.x in, but it has not stopped the messages. >> > >> > I can ping 10.1.1.1, and if I down ep0, I cannot ping 10.1.1.1. >> > >> > I have alerted my ISP to this problem (thought 10.x.x.x weren't >> > suppose to be routed). >> >> Darryl, >> >> What IP addresses does your DSL router use, possibly 10.x.x.x ? >> > >Whoops, re-read your post, my bad. I have seen ISP's use >non-routable IP's in their infrastructure before, this is >"not a good thing" but helps them conserve IP addresses. > >Can you traceroute to 10.1.1.1 or a polite nmap, this may provide >you with some more clues. > > >Regards, > >Stephen Hilton >nospam@hiltonbsd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message