From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Sep 21 07:42:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BCD3E8EBD for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.posteo.de", Issuer "StartCom Class 3 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BvxGq6986z3cVZ for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723182400FC for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4BvxGm62JBz6tmk for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:42:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Walter von Entferndt To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: after latest patches i386 not fully patched Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:41:48 +0200 Message-ID: <9080800.RH3biPoPvx@t450s.local.lan> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BvxGq6986z3cVZ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mout02.posteo.de has no SPF policy when checking 185.67.36.142) smtp.helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.53 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[posteo.net : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.911]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.78)[-0.782]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.34)[-0.338]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.67.36.142:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8495, ipnet:185.67.36.0/23, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[walter.von.entferndt@posteo.net,]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:42:12 -0000 At Sonntag, 20. September 2020, 14:00:00 CEST, Ed Maste wrote: > Until pkgbase is in place the most straightforward way to address this > issue will probably be for us to ship a new kernel even if not > necessary, just to update the version number. -1 from all with limited bandwith and/or volume. Updates should be as small as possible. -- =|o) "Stell' Dir vor es geht und keiner kriegt's hin." (Wolfgang Neuss)