From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  1 22:23:51 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC7D526
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Feb 2015 22:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru
 [46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03680D38
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Feb 2015 22:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.135.70] (unknown [94.19.235.70])
 (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
 by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 016B35C002
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 01:23:27 +0300 (MSK)
Message-ID: <54CEA776.1040505@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 01:23:50 +0300
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
Organization: FreeBSD
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Does "setfib" in ipfw forces to re-route packet?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:23:51 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


 "man 8 ipfw" doesn't state, that setting new fib on "out" packet
(whrn routing decision is done and output interface is known) change
routing decision:

""The packet is tagged so as to use the FIB (routing table) fibnum in
any subsequent forwarding decisions.""

 But according to ip_output.c (around line 527) "setfib" FORCES to
make NEW decision!

 Do I read sources right? Maybe, wording in ipfw(8) should be changed?

- -- 
// Lev Serebryakov AKA Black Lion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=Poez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----