From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 06:30:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03F11065670 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00E18FC17 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7N6UCAg019514 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:30:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7N6UCmw019511; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:30:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:30:12 GMT Message-Id: <201108230630.p7N6UCmw019511@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Taras Korenko Cc: Subject: Re: docs/159897: [patch] improve HAST section of Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Taras Korenko List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:30:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/159897; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Taras Korenko To: Warren Block Cc: Benjamin Kaduk , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/159897: [patch] improve HAST section of Handbook Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:09:36 +0300 On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:08:09PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > >On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Warren Block wrote: > > > >>On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Warren Block wrote: > >>> > >>>>- File system agnostic, thus allowing to use any file > >>>>+ File system agnostic, thus allowing use of any file > >>> > >>>I think "allowing the use" is better here. > >> > >>"allowing any" might be even better. > > > >I don't think that would be correct usage -- "allowing any file system" to > >do what? > > Allowing any file system versus allowing only file systems made for > HAST. Looking at it again, the problem is the word "allowing". What > this is really saying is: "File system agnostic, compatible with any > file system supported by &os;." > File system agnostic, thus allowing laying out any file system supported by &os;. -- Best regards, Taras Korenko