From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 29 13:58:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC65216A452
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel@stiw.org)
Received: from smtp.conceptual.net.au (grimiore.conceptual.net.au
	[203.190.192.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F56E43D45
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:58:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel@stiw.org)
Received: from spock.enterprise.prvt (202-137-107-088.adsl.usertools.net
	[202.137.107.88])
	by smtp.conceptual.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C404313947
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:58:16 +0800 (WST)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu>
	<200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com>
Message-ID: <op.suog3dbwjjurwa@spock.enterprise.prvt>
From: "Daniel Marsh" <daniel@stiw.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:58:15 +0800
In-Reply-To: <200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com>
User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (Win32, build 7561)
Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:58:20 -0000

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:13:49 +0800, MikeM <the.lists@mgm51.com> wrote:

> On 7/28/2005 at 11:57 AM Bob Johnson wrote:
>
> |Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation.
> |Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but
> |if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented.
>  =============
>
> The process of installing Windows on a clean disk leaves the disk in
> need of defragmenting.

As he said, "if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented"