From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Sep 30 16:59:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from strange.eng.utoledo.edu (strange.eng.utoledo.edu [131.183.18.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FF337B408 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 16:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from strange.eng.utoldeo.edu ([131.183.21.43]) by strange.eng.utoledo.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/1.1) with SMTP id TAA17716 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 19:59:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200109302359.TAA17716@strange.eng.utoledo.edu> Received: by strange.eng.utoldeo.edu (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 30 Sep 2001 19:59:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 19:59:02 -0400 From: grafe@eng.utoledo.edu (Gary E. RAFE) To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: APM suspend/resume on Toshiba Satellite 1800-S253 Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Before I send this Toshiba Satellite 1800-S253 back, I built a kernel with APM_DEBUG messages enabled (4.3-R), and took a look at what happens when the notebook is suspended with "apm -z". dmesg(8) DEBUG output relevant to APM: apm0: on motherboard apm: APM BIOS version 0102 apm: Code16 0xc00f0000, Data 0xc00f0000 apm: Code entry 0x00006209, Idling CPU disabled, Management enabled apm: CS_limit=0xffff, DS_limit=0xffff apm: Engaged control enabled apm: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 apm: Slow Idling CPU disabled Add hook "default suspend" Add hook "default resume" The notebook was suspended with "apm -z" at approximately xx:05:00; it was subsequently powered back on at approximately xx:09:00, at which time the resume failed. Relevant /var/log/messages entries for these events: xx:09:48 /kernel APM ioctl: cmd = 0x20005001 xx:09:48 /kernel Execute APM hook "default suspend." xx:09:48 /kernel Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. So, can someone explain to me why the suspend isn't registered in /var/log/messages at xx:05:00 ? What sequence of events following the APM "default suspend" hook is supposed to take place ? Is the Toshiba ACPI BIOS choking on this at some point ? I expect to have the notebook for a couple more days, at least, and would like to gain a better understanding as why this is failing on the 1800-S253. -- Gary Rafe grafe@eng.utoledo.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message