From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Apr 20 23:47:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA21657
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA21638
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA18648; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: rkw@dataplex.net, jdn@qiv.com, mkino@po.iijnet.or.jp, stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is there a perceived need for a 2.1.8 release? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:30:03 PDT."
             <199704210630.XAA24540@blimp.mimi.com> 
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:47:27 -0700
Message-ID: <18646.861605247@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Exactly my point! :-) That's why the idea of including it on the SNAP
was so appealing.  Low expectations, no packages. :-)

>  * for awhile.  It's the installer's definitive 2.1-stable CD and it's
>  * probably also the primary 2.2 installation CD for at least 4-5 more
>  * months.  I'm going to get away with not making a packages collection
>  * for each?  Not hardly!  I would be lynched! :-)
> 
> Yeah, but who's going to build the packages for 2.1.8R? :)
> 
> Satoshi