Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:36:59 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Christian Weisgerber" <naddy@mips.inka.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool, not installing .la files? Message-ID: <opsiylzxf69aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <cpki03$hq2$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <cpki03$hq2$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:02:59 +0000 (UTC), Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > What are the current hacks to avoid installing .la files? > > My libogg and libvorbis ports used to not install .la files. Now > I'm getting mail from kris' scripts that the libogg port misses > libogg.la from its plist. Wondering why I get no report for > libvorbis, I checked that port only to see that kris has already > added the .la files to the plist there. > > Apparently the libtool changes in recent months have changed things, > but in between USE_LIBTOOL_VER, USE_INC_LIBTOOL_VER, and USE_GNOME=lthack > I'm lost. What's the proper way to deal with a port that uses > libtool to build its libraries? How to skip .la? > > Is this documented anywhere? I haven't check in porter handbook, but we (FreeBSD GNOME Team) has a small documented about libtool over at http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html (below). Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opsiylzxf69aq2h7>