From owner-cvs-all Sat Mar 17 6:17: 6 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9362537B718; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 06:17:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p31-dn01kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.32]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id XAA08277; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:16:55 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3AB3711F.42629FB6@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:13:51 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Malone Cc: Peter Wemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sys/alpha/include types.h sys/i386/include types.h sys/ia64/include types.h sys/powerpc/include types.h sys/kern vfs_cache.c sys/nfs nfs.h nfs_node.c sys/sys fnv_hash.h References: <200103171050.aa94864@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Malone wrote: > > > Make the name cache hash as well as the nfsnode hash use it. > > Any information on how this changes the performance of the name > cache? The NFS commit message had some interesting stats - does > this yield similar improvements? I'm interested on what kind of names this hash algorithm was designed to handle. Can you provide an url to a paper describing the algorithm? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.secret.bsdconspiracy.net It's a rewarding life, but hey, somebody has to have all the fun, right? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message