From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 17 17:33:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBD610656C8 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (mail.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:2::11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B9B8FC1A for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from thor.farley.org (HPooka@thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5HHX33f030059 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:03 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.farley.org Cc: Subject: libflashsupport.so with Fedora 10 base X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:33:06 -0000 I noticed that there is no libflashsupport.so for f10. While creating a link libssl.so.6 to libssl.so.7 in /compat/linux/lib appears to work, I thought it would be better to have an up-to-date libflashsupport.so. I am being lazy, so there are no patches to use it. :) I wish to thank everyone involved for the existence of VirtualBox on FreeBSD. It is built along with the patch in PR ports/127839. http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/linux-f10-flashsupport-9.0.1.i386.tar.gz Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org