From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Nov 29 13:10:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B56B37B41C for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 17311 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2001 21:10:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop.baldwin.cx) ([64.81.54.73]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Nov 2001 21:10:38 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20011129154849.A47136@acidpit.org> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:10:24 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Robert Hough Subject: Re: Feeding the Troll (Was: freebsd as a desktop ?) Cc: chat@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 29-Nov-01 Robert Hough wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001, Anthony Atkielski wrote: >> >> Because a single-user system does not have the overhead of a >> multiuser system, and it is more ergonomic as well. > > Why when I see you write ergonomic, do I keep thinking of the movie "The > Princess Bride"? > > Anthony: ergonomic! > Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means, what > you think it means. > > > Sorry, I'm getting old. I just have a hard time fitting your use of the > word ergonomics into the discussion at hand. Perhaps I just don't have > all that definitions for ergonomic in my head? Inconceivable! -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message