From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 4 02:12:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C96952 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 02:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20A4165D for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 02:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-246-96.lns20.per2.internode.on.net [121.45.246.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB42CVoO010170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:12:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <529E8F89.4050909@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:12:25 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND chroot environment in 10-RELEASE...gone? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:12:41 -0000 On 12/4/13, 9:05 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > As far as I could tell it was a religious issue. I believe this to be the case, and as with a lot of religious issues, truth is often "adjusted" for particular points of view. > > [...] > As for 9.9.x ESV it will be support for to at least June 2017, which > is 5+ years from BIND 9.9.0, and 4 years after 9.9.x was announced as > the ESV series with BIND 9.9.3. BIND 9.6 went ESV in Mar 2010 and > will be EoL in Jan 2014. BIND 9.10 in is alpha at the moment. BIND 10 > is still in development. So, basically, we were not told the entire story.. We were told that bind-9 was a dead-end.. if it is not I feel kind of disappointed by the people who made the change. We trust other developers to be honest about these things as we can't all track all other projects.. It's a pitty that you didn't join the conversation when it was being discussed. Some fact injection may have made a difference and saved us some heartache.