From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Jul 2 12:28:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082A015D23B8; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay108.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay108.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B73183DF8; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2B8AACVTBtd/1H1sVtlGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBVgIBAQEBCwGCFlliIRIUFIQciHuJeAEBgg41AYoQkCcJAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQEBAQE3AQGEQAKCFSY3Bg4BAwEBBQEBAQEFbYpDhUsBBSMzIxALDgoCAgU?= =?us-ascii?q?hAgIPSAYTG4UWpHWBMoktgRCBDCgBi3WBf4QjPoREgwqCWASOM5wCCYIYk3E?= =?us-ascii?q?nl2yEEaJYIoFYTTAIgyeCTReOIz0DMI53AQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2B8AACVTBtd/1H1sVtlGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBV?= =?us-ascii?q?gIBAQEBCwGCFlliIRIUFIQciHuJeAEBgg41AYoQkCcJAQECAQEBAQE3AQGEQ?= =?us-ascii?q?AKCFSY3Bg4BAwEBBQEBAQEFbYpDhUsBBSMzIxALDgoCAgUhAgIPSAYTG4UWp?= =?us-ascii?q?HWBMoktgRCBDCgBi3WBf4QjPoREgwqCWASOM5wCCYIYk3Enl2yEEaJYIoFYT?= =?us-ascii?q?TAIgyeCTReOIz0DMI53AQE?= Received: from 81.245-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.245.81]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2019 14:28:34 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x62CSXcG013441; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:28:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:28:33 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Torsten Zuehlsdorff , "Timur I. Bakeyev" , Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 Message-ID: <20190702142827.120588a0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20190702111647.vozqzf4gnqbajvcl@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201906192240.x5JMequU017187@repo.freebsd.org> <20190628070305.eim4o3d77iyti5d5@ivaldir.net> <20190629160445.051f2426@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20190702102316.wv6w5u2ilfaw6vrd@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20190702111647.vozqzf4gnqbajvcl@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1B73183DF8 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.973,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:28:37 -0000 On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:16:47 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: >> On 02.07.19 12:23, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: >>>> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 22:50, Baptiste Daroussin wr= ote: >>>>> Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I. Bakeyev" = a >>>>> =C3=A9crit : >>>>>> Tonight I hope to commit 4.10 port. >>>>> >>>>> It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution,= as I >>>>> said even fedora is on the legacy >>>>> >>>> I've committed net/samba410. >>>> >>>> My view on the situation is that all the ports, which use >>>> devel/{talloc,tevent}, databases/tdb should keep >>>> using them, unless they are broken by using them(but that shouldn't ha= ppen, >>>> API still should remain >>>> the same. The biggest difference is the drop of the dependency on Pyth= on27, >>>> as far as I can see. >>>=20 >>> So, branching 2019Q2 is now a day late. >>> When are you going to fix the issue? >>=20 >> Mat, is this the reason the branch is late? If so: have you considered >> branching from r504589? >=20 > It is being considered, yes, as a last resort kind of thing. timur@ has > had 13 days to fix the problem, I hope he is getting close to fixing it > all. It's probably time to introduce some sort of a soft freeze where no major changes are allowed (unless approved by portmgr) in the last two weeks or so of the quarter. It's not just samba, x11@ moving the mesa ports to llvm80 on the last day of the quarter is also way too close.