From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 11 0:18:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail-in-02.piro.net (mail-out-01.piro.net [194.64.31.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5280E37B579 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marc.vanwoerkom@science-factory.com) Received: from nil.science-factory.com (ScienceFactory-atm1-153.piro.net [195.135.137.205]) by mail-in-02.piro.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/PN-991208) with ESMTP id JAA24087; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:17:57 +0200 Received: by nil.science-factory.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id B807D1FFF; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:15:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc van Woerkom To: jandrese@mitre.org Cc: marc.vanwoerkom@science-factory.com, bartol@salk.edu, joeo@cracktown.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <3993150B.5E6C934B@mitre.org> (jandrese@mitre.org) Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and DRI References: <20000810202515.369131EF4@nil.science-factory.com> <3993150B.5E6C934B@mitre.org> Message-Id: <20000811071542.B807D1FFF@nil.science-factory.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm not so convinced. I ran Utah-glx on my G200 card and never saw any > of the promised speed increase. I have only experience with nvidia cards, whose Utah GLX driver had the reputation to be a lot less powerful than the Matrox one. For nvidia it was not close to an accelerated Win32 driver, but it was obviously faster than pure software rendering. > Maybe nothing was using any of the > advanced features of my card, I don't know. Sounds a bit like it did not kick in. > increase may be due to the more efficent 2D. I'm not sure if the 3D > acceleration ever worked under X. For G400 I remember happy users, about G200 I would need to have a look in my mail archive at home.. Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message