Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:15:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc van Woerkom <marc.vanwoerkom@science-factory.com> To: jandrese@mitre.org Cc: marc.vanwoerkom@science-factory.com, bartol@salk.edu, joeo@cracktown.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and DRI Message-ID: <20000811071542.B807D1FFF@nil.science-factory.com> In-Reply-To: <3993150B.5E6C934B@mitre.org> (jandrese@mitre.org) References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10008101117330.1756-200000@euler.salk.edu> <20000810202515.369131EF4@nil.science-factory.com> <3993150B.5E6C934B@mitre.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm not so convinced. I ran Utah-glx on my G200 card and never saw any > of the promised speed increase. I have only experience with nvidia cards, whose Utah GLX driver had the reputation to be a lot less powerful than the Matrox one. For nvidia it was not close to an accelerated Win32 driver, but it was obviously faster than pure software rendering. > Maybe nothing was using any of the > advanced features of my card, I don't know. Sounds a bit like it did not kick in. > increase may be due to the more efficent 2D. I'm not sure if the 3D > acceleration ever worked under X. For G400 I remember happy users, about G200 I would need to have a look in my mail archive at home.. Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000811071542.B807D1FFF>