From owner-freebsd-net Thu Mar 21 19: 1: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d135.as15.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.136.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF2B37B404 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:00:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2M8x55d004037; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:59:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from localhost (silby@localhost) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id g2M8x4ln004034; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:59:05 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:59:04 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Jeff Roberson Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting rid of maxsockets. In-Reply-To: <20020320152915.Q41335-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Message-ID: <20020322025429.K3059-100000@patrocles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > Once everything's UMA'd, then we can develop new sizing parameters. > > Everything has been UMA'd other than MD code, so I'm working on making the > system take advantage of it. > > Thanks! > Jeff I've looked over vmstat -z with a UMA kernel, it's really nice to know that everything is coexisting together now. There's one big target, though: mbufs. I know that Bosko put a lot of work into his new mbuf allocator, but if you could find a way to merge mbufs into the slab allocator the benefits would be huge. Have you discussed doing this with Bosko yet? Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message