From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 11:57:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF2B37B401 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4C3743F93 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:57:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blueeskimo@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 13184 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Aug 2003 18:57:54 -0000 Received: from dsl-cust-145.openweb.ca (EHLO [64.39.186.145]) (64.39.186.145) by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 01 Aug 2003 20:57:54 +0200 From: Adam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1059764308.25632.0.camel@elwood> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 01 Aug 2003 14:58:28 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Semi OT: Linux lawsuit and FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:57:57 -0000 On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 14:50, Stephen Hovey wrote: > The time is SOOOO ripe for a big noise to make a big impact to get people > to see the light on FBSD's superiority etc... > > Ive seen some article - but nothing like what I should.. > > I wonder how, those of us you really know its worth, can properly toot it > ! This message belongs on freebsd-advocacy@ , not here, -- Adam