From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 16:47:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FB937B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f1D0kKa07689; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:46:20 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Alex Zepeda Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -CURRENT is bad for me... Message-ID: <20010212164620.D3038@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200102122119.f1CLJaW31538@harmony.village.org> <20010212134216.A1647@zippy.mybox.zip> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010212134216.A1647@zippy.mybox.zip>; from jazepeda@pacbell.net on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:42:16PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:42:16PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote: > Yup, I agree here. IMO so many things depend on the stdio bits, that a > major number increase would have been desireable. So far, bzip2, > pine/pico, GNU make, the GNU i18n stuff, fetchmail all needed to be > rebuilt. Bumping the major number would at least allow these a stay of > execution. /usr/ports is *very* easy to use. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message