From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 13:58:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AB216A4CE; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:58:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DA043D2F; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:58:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 6F5D55309; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:58:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 9AD415308; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:57:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 8013933C9A; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:57:55 +0100 (CET) To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org References: <200401162154.i0GLsuKq056578@repoman.freebsd.org> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:57:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200401162154.i0GLsuKq056578@repoman.freebsd.org> (Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:54:56 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_descrip.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:58:05 -0000 Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > WITNESS won't let us hold two filedesc locks at the same time, so juggle > fdp and newfdp around a bit. The question though is, is there a real reason why we can't hold two filedesc locks at the same time, or is WITNESS being unnecessarily pedantic? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no