Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:40:29 -0800 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any problem going from 9.x (don't laugh) to 11 directly? Message-ID: <864lmjhvxu.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1802142036180.86259@ary.qy> (John R. Levine's message of "14 Feb 2018 20:38:23 -0500") References: <20180215011907.6620E1B2DE28@ary.qy> <868tbvhwix.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1802142036180.86259@ary.qy>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "John" == John R Levine <johnl@iecc.com> writes: John> It's possible but I have several VPS running 10.4 and have yet to John> run into a port that said 11.x only. If a release is still John> supported, the ports should work on it. On the other hand there John> are plenty of ports that are abandoned and don't build at all. John> Which ones are you thinking of? I need to go back through my poudriere logs and see where the trouble is. The big problem (and why I'm still on 9) is the shoemaker's children issue. I have big bills to pay, and this is all non-billable time. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Perl/Unix/Dart consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. Still trying to think of something clever for the fourth line of this .sig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864lmjhvxu.fsf>