From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 13 06:01:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA21265 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 06:01:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from elvis.vnet.net (elvis.vnet.net [166.82.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA21259 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 06:01:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from ponds.dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by elvis.vnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA21198; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 09:01:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA23939; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 09:17:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id JAA01460; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 09:07:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 09:07:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199710131307.JAA01460@lakes.dignus.com> To: dcarmich@mcs.com, Shimon@i-Connect.Net Subject: RE: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Simon Shapiro writes:> > > Hi Douglas Carmichael; On 13-Oct-97 you wrote: > > Could FreeBSD be made to comply with B1 or C2 trusted system standards > > FOR REAL (unlike NT that can only comply when not hooked up to a > > network)? > > Last I checked (looooong time ago), Unix had the same problem. TCP/IP was, > at the time, inhenerntly un-Orangable. > Hmmm.. Data General has a variant of DG/UX which is at least B1 (if not C2...) Does anyone know the details there? Perhaps I can dig up some old contacts and find out what they did with this issue. - Dave Rivers -