Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 17:18:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 264575] databases/evolution-data-server: WITH_KRB5=/usr ignored if security/krb5 is installed Message-ID: <bug-264575-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D264575 Bug ID: 264575 Summary: databases/evolution-data-server: WITH_KRB5=3D/usr ignored if security/krb5 is installed Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com CC: cy@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org CC: cy@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org If security/krb5 is installed, evolution-data-server's configure & build st= ages will find and use the kerberos package in /usr/local instead of the one in /usr. It seems to build okay, but it reflects a hidden/untracked dependency. All= the .so files are linked with kerberos libraries in /usr/local/lib. If the krb5 package is subsequently removed, this will break evolution-data-server due = to the missing libraries. I don't have a test to check if there is a functional difference between the base krb libs and the ports krb libs. If anyone does, please mention it he= re. If there is no functional difference, then the resolution to the untracked dependency problem is probably to investigate what cmake is doing (never anyone's favorite task to dig into cmake), and figure out how to correctly = get it to link explicitly with the desired krb (base or ports). Optionally, evolution-data-server could just be modified to depend on the security/krb5 port (if the KERBEROS option is on). If the base krb libs wo= rk just fine for evolution-data-server's needs, the extra dependency on the po= rt could be seen as just an unnecessary extra dependency (extends build/install times and uses extra disk space - although the krb5 package is not a big ho= g in either regard, build time or space). If base is built without krb, of course, then things will likely break at b= uild time (if no krb pkg is installed). So it is an additional desirable update= to support selecting krb from base or krb from ports as an enhancement to the KERBEROS option. I don't have a patch to resolve any of the above at this time. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-264575-6497>