From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 7 12:51:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA22222 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA22214; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA00656; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199610071951.MAA00656@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: John Fieber cc: Paul DuBois , Wolfram Schneider , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HyperMail? (was Re: Interrupt lossage in FreeBSD-current. ) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Oct 1996 11:08:31 CDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 12:51:24 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of John Fieber : > Still, I'm not happy with the current arrangement (freewais-sf).. > I've found the software to be terribly buggy. CNIDR's isearch is > better but far to slow to be used on a machine that doesn't have > enough memory to index in one pass. > Howdy, So what is a good search/indexing interface which we can use for the mailing lists? Just a shot in the dark, maybe one of the ISPs can afford to use a "commercial" grade package to index the mailing lists. Tnks, Amancio