From owner-freebsd-small Wed Jan 10 15:52:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3566037B6A3 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:52:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0ANqbI56681; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:52:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200101102352.f0ANqbI56681@iguana.aciri.org> Subject: Re: sash as a shell replacement ? In-Reply-To: from Andrzej Bialecki at "Jan 11, 2001 0:15: 9 am" To: abial@webgiro.com (Andrzej Bialecki) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:52:37 -0800 (PST) Cc: rizzo@aciri.org, small@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > sash has very poor shell functionality. I would suggest using Minix sh > which is very Bourne-like, and is also very small. what kind of licensing does it have ? I was about to go for a different approach, namely use the standard sh as a shell, and a slightly modified 'sash' for a bunch of commands such as more, grep etc. cheers luigi > BTW. if someone has the time and inclination to make a couple of ports for > useful small Minix programs, I can provide the patches to make them run > under FreeBSD. > > Andrzej Bialecki > > // WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) > // ------------------------------------------------------------------- > // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- > // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message