From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 02:21:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55A437B401 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 02:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276F943F93 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 02:21:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h6B9LWk03952; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 02:21:33 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: Tokarev , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 02:21:26 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200307110855.h6B8tgX2001911@flux.leasat.net> In-Reply-To: <200307110855.h6B8tgX2001911@flux.leasat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307110221.26634.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: cvsup freebsd 5.1 fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:21:48 -0000 On Friday 11 July 2003 01:55 am, Tokarev wrote: > Hello all. cvsup problem.... 4.8->5.1 > make bildworld > > building shared library libkse.so.1 > thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': > thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' > thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here > thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': > thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' > thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here > *** Error code 1 > > Does anyone know someting about this? Too many choices to guess. You didn't say whether you cvsuped tag=. or what. If you are going to upgrade to 5.x, you are supposed to follow -current because that is where most of the people using it are. In an upgrade to 5.x, there is a procedure in /usr/src/UPDATING that you are supposed to follow. When I installed 5.0-r on opal, I did a clean install. So, I have never used the procedure to do an upgrade. Opal is currently running 5-current right now. If you cvsuped tag=., you may have hit the upgrade to gcc-3.3.1, which was posted as a HEADSUP to -current. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html