From owner-freebsd-ipfw Wed Jul 28 13:18: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F474153FA; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:17:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.9.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA93827; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 16:17:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: janus.syracuse.net: green owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 16:17:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: Nate Williams Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: securelevel and ipfw zero In-Reply-To: <199907282008.OAA02877@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > > > These were changes that were necessary to make ipfw readable enough that > > I could work with it in this area. They aren't just to clean it up, or > > just for change's sake. They need to stay in. > > C'mon now, re-ording the lines is *certainly* not necessary to work. That's true. I sure didn't do that. > > *rant on* > Brian, FreeBSD isn't your private playground for playing around, this is > a group project, and you gotta follow the rules, or you don't get to > play with the rest of the folks.... The rules don't say "leave the code that you work with in a bigger mess than when you started." Cleaning up code is a fact of life, and it _NEEDS_ to be done to get work done, very often. You have to learn to deal with that. > *rant off* > > > > > Nate > Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message