From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 09:51:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32A116A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 09:51:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from sarajevo.pacific.net.sg (sarajevo.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 179C943D48 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 09:51:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 17709 invoked from network); 30 May 2005 09:51:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell6.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.212) by sarajevo with SMTP; 30 May 2005 09:51:28 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.101]) by maxwell6.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20050530095127.PHXJ1233.maxwell6.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Mon, 30 May 2005 17:51:27 +0800 Message-ID: <429AE21B.3070303@pacific.net.sg> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 17:51:23 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050514) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg References: <429ACA6F.9000302@pacific.net.sg> <429ADDB9.2000608@401.cx> In-Reply-To: <429ADDB9.2000608@401.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [30-05-05] Layout update X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:51:31 -0000 Hi, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: > Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> John Jawed wrote: >> >>> I've tried to amend to the best of my ability the resizing issues >>> mentioned earlier. I think, if you do not know much about CSS >>> layouts, that you should expect some type of distortion at some >>> unrealistically small resolutions (less than 800x600). >> >> >> Try to use a fixed width for the left and right columns. > > > I beg to differ, use fixed size for the middle column instead and let > the right side column get whatever is left over. > The problem on my screen is that the right side column is way to wide > and squeezes the middle column into a thin stripe of text, basically > unreadable. It does not really matter which part is fixed as long as some part is fixed. > Believe it or not, but the most common resolution today is still > 800x600. And, even with a 19" screen and 1280x1024, I *never* use my 'Our' sites are visted mostly with 1024 * 768. > Designing webpages for big screens with high resolutions is just bad > practice, imho! > You would call 10" big? Erich