From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 12:20:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B44C2A7 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBFF8FC14 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCCK7vT062093; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:20:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBCCK6Rg062053; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:20:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:20:06 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: FreeBSD for serious performance? In-Reply-To: <20594.1355090530@tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: References: <20594.1355090530@tristatelogic.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:20:07 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:20:10 -0000 >> >> So clock rate is the only thing that matters in your world? > > Yea, pretty much. operations per second do matter. compared to latest x86 hardware alpha lose even at the same clock speed.