From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Nov 3 2:31:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (flutter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CFB37B4C5 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 02:31:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eA3AV2h04561; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 11:31:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Matt Dillon , Marius Bendiksen , Randell Jesup , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Like to commit my diskprep In-Reply-To: Your message of "03 Nov 2000 11:28:41 +0100." Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 11:31:02 +0100 Message-ID: <4559.973247462@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >Matt Dillon writes: >> Yes. Increasing the number of bytes per inode will reduce the number >> of inodes and thus reduce fsck time. Increasing the number of cylinders >> in a group will localize inodes into bigger chunks, reducing seeking >> and also thus reduce fsck time. > >That was what I hoped - thanks! ...and setting your fragment size to 4k has a surprisingly small positive effect on your performance. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message