From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 30 16:13:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from osgroup.com (unknown [38.229.41.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C703C14D5B for ; Sun, 30 May 1999 16:13:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stan@osgroup.com) Received: from stan166 ([38.229.41.237]) by osgroup.com (8.7.6/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA01822 for ; Sun, 30 May 1999 18:01:59 -0500 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Sun, 30 May 1999 18:14:33 -0500 Message-ID: <01BEAAC8.445E89A0.stan@osgroup.com> From: Constantine Shkolnyy Reply-To: "stan@osgroup.com" To: "hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: Kernel config script Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 18:14:31 -0500 Organization: Ashley Laurent, Inc. X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, May 30, 1999 5:39 PM, Mike Smith [SMTP:mike@smith.net.au] wrote: > > I think its useful if it gets linux people less afraid of FreeBSD. > > I'm not sure we want those sort of people. You don't want FreeBSD to have more users? Do you think it already has enough users? How many users is enough? What is the goal of the FreeBSD project? To be the test platform for new kernel ideas exclusively? Why do you tolerate the presence of the X on the FreeBSD CD-ROMs then? Making the script is like making more documentation. Is the current FreeBSD documentation so plentiful that making more documentation would harm somebody? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message